Apr 20 2025

Measles Virus On Trial

measles virus no proof case law

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) and the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Stuttgart have written world history. https://wissenschafftplus.de/blog/de (In German, use Google translate)

 

In the five-year "measles virus trial" the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart on February 16th 2016, sensationally ruled that all allegations concerning the measles infection, measles vaccination, and the measles virus have no scientific basis.

 

At the end of Dr. Lanka's appeal hearing, the presiding judge Oleschkewitz said to the plaintiff Dr. Bardens that the court with three judges had decided 3:0 against him.

 

This is a novelty in German legal history. Never before has a court publicly stated whether it decided 3:0, 0:3, 2:1 or 1:2. The emotions of the judge are not surprising when one reads up on the subject and becomes aware of the dimensions of the medical malpractice. From a biological point of view, it is not surprising that the presiding judge lost his voice when reading out the verdict. He went "in recess."

 

You can find the important judgment of the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart, AZ .: 12 U 63/15 from 16.02.2016 here: Urteil des 12. Zivilsenats vom 16.2.2016 - 12 U 63/15 - (juris.de)

 

On December 1, 2016, the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe confirmed the sensational ruling of the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court.

 

You can find the Federal Court' s decision here: BGH _ Beschluss _ I _ ZR _ 62- 16.pdf (wissenschafftplus.de)

 

It has been German case law since December 1, 2016, that even the first publication in the measles virus trial, the publication of the Nobel Prize winner John Franklin Enders and his colleagues from 1954, does not constitute proof of the alleged existence of the suspected "measles virus."

 

What makes this fact so significant is that this publication is the sole and exclusive basis of all other approximately 30,000 " scientific " publications on the topic of " measles virus " and "infection " with measles.

 

Since it is now case law that this publication contains no proof of the alleged existence of the assumed measles virus, it is clear that all 30,000 specialist publications on these topics are without foundation.

 

Thus: In the exact same way, every single so-called "virus" is refuted. "Viruses" simply do not exist! Let that sink in! Anti-vaxxers have been right all along! Vaccines are poison!


I. How They "Find" Viruses 1 minute. Explains how virologists fraudulently cause the cytopathic effect (CPE), or simply cell death, by killing the cells with antibiotics and starvation before adding the "virus" containing sample! And then blame "the virus" for the cell death, and use this as "proof" of virus in the sample! Then they use a COMPUTER PROGRAM to fraudulently sequence a virus from the dead cell mixture! (What a joke!!!) Thus, this video debunks the entire field of virology in less than 1 minute, by pointing out these two things! Just the dead cells and the right computer program IS ALL YOU NEED!


III. Final Refutal Of Virology A 20 minute exposé of how the (now defunct) field of virology collapsed on its own lies. Dr. Stefan Lanka (virologist) did the control experiments that are never done in virology. This 20 minute video, that has received millions of views around the world (over 1 million in Germany alone) shows that the cytopathic effect [Cyto-Pathic-Effect (CPE)] used as "proof" of a virus, is no proof at all, and that it is caused only by the treatment of the cell culture prior to adding the alleged virus-containing sample. The control experiments, by Dr. Stefan Lanka, ended Virology! {The control experiment is to do everything the same except do not add any supposed "virus sample" and see what happens, are the results different or the same?} 


the end

How They "Find" Viruses

FINAL REFUTAL OF VIROLOGY